Becoming Trekkerman
The first steps in walking the world's best trails

Second Chance Ranch
Ruth Plenty makes a home for horses not ready for the finish line

Square Pegs in the Roundhouse
The legislature's 60-day theater of the absurd

Have Hound, Will Hike
A dog can make a great hiking companion

Columns and Departments

Editor's Note
Desert Diary
100 Hikes
Southwest Gardener
Henry Lightcap's Journal
The Starry Dome
Talking Horses
Ramblin' Outdoors
Guides to Go
Continental Divide

Special Sections

40 Days & 40 Nights
The To-Do List

Red or Green

Savoy de Mesilla
Dining Guide
Table Talk

Arts Exposure

Arts Scene
Louise Sackett
Gallery Guide

Body, Mind
& Spirit

Greasing the Wheels

About the cover

Square Pegs in the Roundhouse, p2


At this year's legislative session, a 60-day tête-à-tête among 60 state representatives (38 Democrats and 32 Republicans) and 42 senators (25 Democrats and 17 Republicans), legislators gazed at over 1,200 bills, memorials and resolutions representing over 50 subjects. Bills were introduced covering everything from a horse slaughtering facility (HB 90 asked for an appropriation of $20,000 to be granted to NMSU to "conduct a study of the feasibility of locating a horse slaughter facility in New Mexico to process horse meat for human consumption" — are horse tacos on the horizon, Wilburrrr? Reps voted "neigh" on this one) to HB 68, which would bring a welcome respite to all of us by shortening the political campaign season in some ways (tabled).


I arrived promptly at 10 to the gallery about the House chamber, only to find, of course, that nothing was going on, nor was anything about to happen soon. While waiting, I heard a familiar voice from the chamber floor (during a recess), that of Dr. Beth Vesco-Mock, director of the Animal Services Center of the Mesilla Valley. Vesco-Mock was busily doing two things with two volunteers from the shelter. The first and least important was to get Rep. Phillip Archuleta (D-Doña Ana) to microchip his pets.

I figured that if Vesco-Mock and her assistants could wander the chamber floor, I could, too. I buttonholed Vesco-Mock, to find out why she was going from representative to representative, handing each a box of animal crackers.

"We are trying to get some money from capital outlay to buy a new van to take animals to other towns or cities where they would have a better chance for adoption," Vesco-Mock answered. "The city gave us an old truck that was going to go to auction last year, but it won't last much longer. I doubt that they will do it, but it's worth a try. Everyone has said they would vote for it, except for one representative."

I had to press her a bit to find out it was Lee Cotter (R-Doña Ana), who pulled off an upset victory over long-time Rep. Mary Jane Garcia last fall. I'd met Cotter in the past and it became immediately clear we had nothing in common except gender. Vesco-Mock said that Cotter had told her that he "didn't believe in that."


There was some good legislation that would make things better for some people. And then there were the suspect bills and resolutions that always bring out the differences in our society.

HB 122, introduced by the House's flashiest dresser, Nora Espinoza (R-Roswell), was sneakily called the "Woman's Right to Know Act." It was Espinoza's "stated" postulation that any woman who was contemplating an abortion should receive all the facts about her pregnancy, by requiring her physician to mandate "an ultrasound and the use of a fetal monitor to make the fetal heartbeat audible to the pregnant female."

Bills that are introduced in New Mexico go through committee review, and HB 122 went to the Consumer and Public Affairs Committee, which held a hearing on it. Espinoza brought a witness with her, a nurse from Albuquerque who claimed that she knew of doctors who did not do this with their patients and the patients were later appalled to find out that this had not happened.

It is during these committee hearings that the public has a voice. You can sit in a stuffy, crowded room with other informed or ignorant citizens, and when the committee chair asks for comments from supporters or from those against a bill, you can speak a brief piece. A show of hands was also asked for in this committee, chaired by Rep. Eliseo Alcon (D-Milan).

Supporters brought up the usual rhetoric, including some guy who spoke about Noah's Ark for reasons that remain unclear. The "nay"-voting citizens were much more prevalent, and a spokesperson from Planned Parenthood reminded all that this service was already provided for and those who did not receive it should seek relief elsewhere.

Rep. Espinoza stated at the outset that this bill was NOT an abortion bill, but rather one about women's rights. Only a few people believed her: two fellow Republicans on the committee (and even one of them wavered for a while) and the eight people from something called the New Mexico Freemen (the Noah's Ark supporters). The bill was tabled, effectively killing it.


Not being one for big "guv'mint" unless it fits her needs (see above), Rep. Espinoza also sponsored HB 114, which spoke of "prohibiting enforcement of federal firearm laws" in New Mexico, making any "federal officer who is an official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm or firearm accessory, or upon ammunition, that is owned or is manufactured commercially or privately in New Mexico" guilty of a third-degree felony.

Pistol-packin' gentlemen were in attendance and spoke up. One of them threatened the committee members with treason charges if they didn't pass the bill, as his square-butted "belly gun" rested smugly against his hip, the caliber probably matching his IQ.

The committee was not moved, the bill was tabled, with Rep. Alcon noting in his summary that he couldn't believe "that such a bill was written." This caused Rep. Espinoza to bluster her way out of the hearing room, her large decorative chapeau spinning rapidly around her carefully coiffured head.

Another shootin' iron bill that was drawing attention was SB 230, which would allow one school employee to carry a concealed weapon on school premises (perhaps an off-season job for Rep. Espinoza). Then there was a resolution by the busy Espinoza and Sen. Pat Woods (R-Broadview), which defined marriage as an act between a man and woman (killed).

Perhaps the bill that caused the most commotion was HB 206 — so much so that its sponsor pulled her contact information off the Web after the bill went viral and national. As originally drafted, the legislation specified that "procuring of an abortion as tampering with evidence in cases of criminal sexual penetration or incest" would be a crime, and a big one to boot. This lawmaking attempt was submitted by Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R-Eddy), an attorney by trade, who later claimed it was worded wrong, although the new version wasn't really any different. Amazingly, she had the support of several other representatives, all Republicans, all women, including the omnipresent Espinoza.


Supposedly, New Mexico's 1850 constitution also disallowed voting privileges to "idiots, insane persons and persons convicted of a felonious or infamous crime." Perhaps adding that phrase to the qualifications required to run for office should be introduced. It might give us a better opportunity to have smart, levelheaded and quality candidates.

It was an interesting session, but I had to hope that more people were contacting these elected officials electronically, by phone or by mail. Not a lot of citizens were in attendance, except for those who had interest in a specific bill or meeting, and most of those folks were from special-interest groups or lobbyists.

I've come away with the idea that democracy can work, but it needs more attention from reasonable people who don't wear three-cornered or tinfoil hats.




Longtime Desert Exposure contributor Jeff Berg now lives in Santa Fe.

You're on Page 2

1 | 2 | ALL

Return to Top of Page