Giving a Hoot
Meet the controversial Mexican spotted owl

The Music Man
Brandon Perrault provides the soundtrack for Grant County

Happy Trails
The Gila Back Country Horsemen celebrate 10 years

Ready to SNAP
Is the Spay & Neuter Awareness Program running out of time?

In Loco's Footsteps
Hiking the Peloncillos where Apaches held off the US Cavalry


Columns and Departments
Editor's Note
Desert Diary

Jennifer Cervantes
Shakespeare's Future
Business Beat
Tumbleweeds Top 10

The Starry Dome
Ramblin' Outdoors
40 Days & 40 Nights
The To-Do List
Guides to Go
Henry Lightcap's Journal
Continental Divide

Special Section
Arts Exposure

Arts News
For the Love of Art Month
Molly Ramolla
Gallery Guide

Body, Mind & Spirit
Spirit Ranch
Why Diets Fail
Energy Medicine

Red or Green

La Iguana
Dining Guide
Table Talk

About the cover

  D e s e r t   E x p o s u r e  February 2011


Words and Weapons

Lighting the fuse for the tragedy in Tucson.

Last year, while anti-government protesters marched on Washington, we overheard a man in the Silver City Wal-Mart grumble, "I hope they take out the whole Congress."

Last month, we happened to be in Tucson, only a few stoplights away from where one deranged gunman tried to start doing just that. He critically injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed six bystanders, including a federal judge and a nine-year-old girl.

Tucson gunman Jared Loughner's politics are as scrambled as his mental state, although his rantings included such familiar hard-right themes as the debasement of the US currency and government conspiracies. Nor is there any simple straight line between our angry Wal-Mart shopper and the shooting spree at a Tucson Safeway supermarket.

But when anti-government activists and the craven politicians seeking to capitalize on their anger resort to violent rhetoric and spout about "tyranny" and "socialism," they need to realize that not everyone understands they are speaking metaphorically. When Sarah Palin tells audiences "don't retreat, reload," some folks really might reach for their guns. Consider:

  • Palin's website featured a map with crosshairs indicating members — including Giffords — who should be targeted for their support of health-care reform. A caption read, "We've diagnosed the problem. Help us prescribe the solution." At the time, Giffords told MSNBC, "We're on Sarah Palin's targeted list. But the thing is the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gunsight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize there's consequences to that." The crosshair graphic was hurriedly taken offline after Giffords was shot in the head.

  • Giffords' district-office door was smashed, possibly by gunfire, after her health-care vote. At an earlier "Congress on Your Corner" meeting at a Safeway in her district, a protester waving a sign that said "Don't Tread on Me" had the pistol he was carrying drop out of the holster under his armpit.

  • Jesse Kelly, Giffords' opponent during the 2010 campaign (whom she narrowly defeated only weeks before Loughner bought the gun used in the Safeway shootings), rallied supporters by urging them to join him in firing M-16 rifles.

  • Campaigning against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Sharon Angle suggested that if Congress didn't become more responsive to the will of the people, the public might have to resort to "Second Amendment remedies."

  • Last spring, US Capitol security officials reported that threats against members of Congress had tripled from the previous year, almost all from opponents of health-care reform.

  • In Washington State, federal officials recently convicted a 64-year-old man for threats against the life of Sen. Patty Murray. The threats, inspired by Murray's support for health-care reform, used some phrases word-for-word from the Fox News fulminations of Glenn Beck.

The list goes on. Since the 2008 election, we've seen a neo-Nazi Obama-hater in Pittsburgh kill three police officers, a tax protester fly a plane into an IRS building in Texas, and a police shootout with a man plotting to attack a liberal group vilified by Beck.

None of this "caused" Loughner to focus homicidal rage on an Arizona congresswoman. But it's hard to believe he was oblivious to the drumbeat of violence and calls to armed insurrection. Honestly, if you didn't see first-hand the vituperative campaigning in Tucson — as we experienced during several visits last year — you can't truly understand the background against which last month's tragedy took place.

As the New York Times noted in an exhaustive report on Loughner's path to murder, "He became an echo chamber for stray ideas, amplifying, for example, certain grandiose tenets of extremist right-wing groups." Times columnist Frank Rich elaborated: "That Loughner was likely insane, with no coherent ideological agenda, does not mean that a climate of antigovernment hysteria has no effect on him or other crazed loners out there."

At an emotional news conference in the wake of the Tucson shooting rampage, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik put it still more bluntly: "The bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous. And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become sort of the capital. We have become the mecca for prejuduce and bigotry."

The next day, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, commented, "The ubiquitous nature of the Internet means that not only threats but also hate speech and other inciteful speech is much more readily available to individuals than quite clearly it was 8 or 10 or 15 years ago. That absolutely presents a challenge for us, particularly when it results in what would be lone wolves or lone offenders undertaking attacks."


We heard much high-minded tut-tutting about resorting to violence as the Tucson shootings reverberated through the nation. In Tucson, the news was full of prayer vigils, and politicians of every stripe urged calm and petitions to the Almighty for the victims.

Frankly, that's not enough. As columnist E.J. Dionne Jr. wrote after the Giffords shooting, "Liberals were rightly pressed in the 1960s to condemn violence on the left. Now, conservative leaders must take on their fringe when it uses language that intimates threats of bloodshed. That means more than just highly general statements praising civility."

If you're shaken by the shootings in Tucson, you can do something about the tenor of our times that contributed to this tragedy — beyond a mere moment of silence. You can change the channel on extremist hatemongers of every stripe. Stop buying their books and their crazy lies. Vow to tamp down your own rhetoric and to get the facts before you speak. Agree to disagree while recognizing that those on the other side also want what's best for the country.

Stop letting politicians play on your fears. "You basically have members [of Congress] who are free agents and are going to cater to the lowest common denominator," said former Rep. Tom Davis, a Republican from Virginia, after the shootings. "I think the leadership in Congress will try to keep it at a civil level, but the talk shows thrive on this stuff. People get elected on this stuff."

As "Gabby" Giffords herself said in an interview after the vandalism to her office, "Look, we can't stand for this. We have to work out our problems by negotiating, working together, hopefully Democrats and Republicans."

Because now we've seen the alternative. It's a shopping center not far from where I'm writing this, still cordoned off with police tape. It's a member of Congress with a gunshot wound through her brain. It's a nine-year-old girl who will never grow up to live out her dreams.

Don't tell me this is just the isolated work of a deranged lone gunman, that it's nobody's fault. If you fill a room with dynamite and leave a box of matches where any lunatic can find them, don't pretend to be surprised when something blows up.

Snow Daze

The blizzard next time.

One of the few frustrations of publishing a monthly — rather than, say, a daily newspaper — is that when things that happen early in the month rouse our interest or ire, by the time readers can read about them in our pages, it can seem like old news. Such, no doubt, is the case with the Great New Year's Blizzard, which paralyzed Silver City and Grant County from Thursday, Dec. 30, when the snow actually fell and blew around, over the holiday weekend and into the following week. By the time you read this, even the prodigious amount of snow that fell will (we hope!) have melted and thoughts will already be turning to the warmer and breezier days of spring just around a calendar page or two.

We guarantee, however, that it will snow again here sometime in the future. It may be awhile, true, before it snows in such volume or accompanied by so much nasty wind. But when it does, let's hope the next snowstorm — or other emergency — doesn't strike the day before a holiday weekend. Perhaps if bad weather can be scheduled on a regular workday the response from Silver City and Grant County authorities wouldn't be so hapless.

We realize that we're spoiled, having grown up and lived in places where a half-foot of blowing snow would only arguably shut down the schools and, in any case, would be plowed, scooped and sanded by the next day. It's understandable that in places like Southwest New Mexico — where "blizzard" usually refers to a Dairy Queen treat — the response would be somewhat less robust.

But shouldn't there at least be a response, especially when forecasts gave several days' warning to plan? Thursday was an all-day whiteout, but Friday came and went — into New Year's Day and then Sunday — with only a handful of roads, like Hwy. 180, getting any attention. Major streets in Silver City appeared untouched within a car length of the main drag, Hudson Street. Spots on Hwy. 90 just south of town were snowpacked and Ridge Road had only been cleared where cars had bulled through the snow. (We know this because, unlike either daily newspaper or our postal carrier, we were out delivering on Friday. Neither rain nor sleet nor even snow etc. shall keep Desert Exposure from our readers!)

County roads, at least those we encountered, were ridiculous. After slip-sliding home even in an all-wheel-drive vehicle, we saw cars strewn on the side of the road just over the hill as though scattered by an angry giant. A truck pulled into our driveway and the driver asked if he could park there overnight; he figured it was safer to walk home.

Foolishly thinking the county authorities might want to learn of this unfolding hazard to public safety — early afternoon the day after the snowstorm, please note — we tried calling the road department. The sheriff's office. The public works department. The county manager's office. The executive assistant to the county manager. No one answered.

Which brings us to a little detour in this rant: In recent years, New Year's Eve has become as much a day off as New Year's Day. The whole Christmas-New Year's week has gotten to be pretty much a lost cause in terms of getting anything done. (And we think the French are lazy!) Sure, we understand the desire to get a jump start on the holiday. But when the area has just been pummeled by bad weather, it should be all hands on deck.

OK, so then Saturday was New Year's Day. Sunday was, well, Sunday. Monday morning about 10 o'clock — more than 80 hours after the blizzard warning had expired — we saw a plow finally half-heartedly tackling Broadway just a block from downtown Silver City. The little bridge on College Avenue just before Hudson was still packed with snow, though, as were all the side streets surrounding the Public Library.

At least we now understand local authorities' snow-handling strategy: Wait until it melts.

In places up north with more wintry weather and higher expectations for snow removal, the sort of official response we saw to the Great New Year's Blizzard would have led to calls for firings and resignations — if not angry mobs armed with torches and pitchforks. (If you doubt that, just ask New York City Major Michael Bloomberg.) While recognizing the limitations of a small town and mostly rural county unused to such weather, Silver City and Grant County taxpayers nonetheless have the right to expect better.

David A. Fryxell is editor of Desert Exposure.


Return to Top of Page